, including PIN numbers . Verizon Communications suffered a major data leakAttack.Databreachdue to a misconfigured cloud server that exposedAttack.Databreachdata on 6 million of its customers . The leak was the result of its third-party provider NICE Systems incorrectly configuring Verizon 's cloud-based file repository housed in an Amazon Web Services S3 bucket on NICE 's cloud server , according to UpGuard , which issued a report on the breach today . Verizon customer names , addresses , account information , including account personal identification numbers ( PINs ) , were compromisedAttack.Databreach. UpGuard in its data estimated that up to 14 million customer records were exposedAttack.Databreach, but Verizon stated that data on 6 million of its users was affected . In one file alone , there were 6,000 PINs that were publicly exposedAttack.Databreach, according to Dan O'Sullivan , a cyber resilience analyst for UpGuard . What 's unique about this leakAttack.Databreachis that it was not just personal data that was publicly exposedAttack.Databreachbut also PINs , according to O'Sullivan . `` The PINs are used to identify a customer to a customer care person , '' O'Sullivan says , noting that an attacker could impersonate the user by using the PIN and then gain access to that individual 's account . Verizon issued a statement acknowledging the public exposureAttack.Databreachof its customer data , but stressed that no loss or theftAttack.Databreachof Verizon or Verizon customer information occurred . The telecom giant also noted : `` To the extent PINs were included in the data set , the PINs are used to authenticate a customer calling our wireline call center , but do not provide online access to customer accounts , '' Verizon stated . `` An employee of one of our vendors put information into a cloud storage area and incorrectly set the storage to allow external access , '' Verizon said . How it Went Down NICE was hired to help Verizon improve its residential and small business wireline self-service call center portal , according to Verizon 's statement . As part of this project , NICE needed certain data that included a limited amount of personal and cell phone number information . None of the information stored for the project included social security numbers , according to Verizon . Meanwhile , on June 8 , UpGuard 's cyber risk research director Chris Vickery came across the AWS S3 data repository and its subdomain `` verizon-sftp . '' The repository held six folders with titles spanning `` Jan-2017 '' to `` June-2017 '' and a number of other files with a .zip format . Vickery was able to fully download the repository because it was configured to be publicly accessible to anyone entering the S3 URL . Following the discovery , UpGuard contacted Verizon on June 13 to inform the telecom giant of the data leakageAttack.Databreachand then on June 22 the exposure was sealed up , according to UpGuard 's report . `` There was a fairly long duration of time before it was fixed , which is troubling , '' O'Sullivan says . Verizon is not the first company to encounter data leakageAttack.Databreachas a result of permissions set to public rather than private on Amazon 's S3 bucket . Earlier this year , UpGuard also discovered a similar situation that involved the Republican National Committee ( RNC ) , which left millions of voter records exposedAttack.Databreachon the cloud account . As in the Verizon case , the RNC relied on a third party vendor to handle its cloud storage needs and it too used Amazon 's AWS S3 . That third-party also improperly set the database to public rather than private . `` The number one thing to keep in mind if you are a CISO is evaluating your third-party vendors . You can have the best security in the world and the best visibility into your systems , but if you pass it onto a third-party vendor without checking out how well they handle their security , then you have done that all in vain , '' O'Sullivan says . `` Verizon did not own the server that was involved here , but it will own the consequences . '' Rich Campagna , CEO of Bitglass , stressed the importance of security teams ensuring services used are configured securely . `` This massive data leakAttack.Databreachcould have been avoided by using specific data-centric security tools , which can ensure appropriate configuration of cloud services , deny unauthorized accessAttack.Databreach, and encrypt sensitive data at rest , '' Campagna said in a statement .
Overall , the chip giant patchedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityfive vulnerabilities across an array of its products . Intel on Tuesday patchedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythree high-severity vulnerabilities that could allow the escalation of privileges across an array of products . Overall , the chip giant fixedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityfive bugs – three rated high-severity , and two medium-severity . The most concerning of these bugs is an escalation-of-privilege glitch in Intel ’ s PROset/Wireless Wi-Fi software , which is its wireless connection management tool . The vulnerability , CVE-2018-12177 , has a “ high ” CVSS score of 7.8 , according to Intel ’ s update . “ Intel is releasingVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitysoftware updates to mitigateVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythis potential vulnerability , ” it said , urging users to updateVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityto version 20.90.0.7 or later of the software . The vulnerability , reportedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityby Thomas Hibbert of Insomnia Security , stems from improper directory permissions plaguing the software ’ s ZeroConfig service in versions before 20.90.0.7 . The issue could allow an authorized user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access . The other high-severity bug exists inVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythe company ’ s System Support Utility for Windows , which offers support for Intel-packed Windows device users . This bug ( CVE-2019-0088 ) is due to insufficient path checking in the support utility , allowing an already-authenticated user to potentially gain escalation of privilege via local access . The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.5 . Versions of System Support Utility for Windows before 2.5.0.15 are impactedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability; Intel recommendsVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityusers updateVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityto versions 2.5.0.15 or later . Independent security researcher Alec Blance was credited with discoveringVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythe flaw . The chip-maker also patchedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya high-severity and medium-severity flaw in its Software Guard Extensions ( SGX ) platform and software , which help application developers to protect select code and data from disclosure or modification . “ Multiple potential security vulnerabilities in Intel SGX SDK and Intel SGX Platform Software may allow escalation of privilege or information disclosure , ” saidVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityIntel . The high-severity flaw in SGX ( CVE-2018-18098 ) has a CVSS score of 7.5 and could allow an attacker with local access to gain escalated privileges . The vulnerability is rooted inVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityimproper file verification in the install routine for Intel ’ s SGX SDK and Platform Software for Windows before 2.2.100 . It was discoveredVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityby researcher Saif Allah ben Massaoud . Another vulnerability in the platform ( CVE-2018-12155 ) is only medium in severity , but could allow an unprivileged user to cause information disclosure via local access . That ’ s due to data leakageAttack.Databreachin the cryptographic libraries of the SGX platform ’ s Integrated Performance Primitives , a function that provides developers with building blocks for image and data processing . And finally , a medium escalation of privilege vulnerability in Intel ’ s SSD data-center tool for Windows has been patchedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerability. “ Improper directory permissions in the installer for the Intel SSD Data Center Tool for Windows before v3.0.17 may allow authenticated users to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access , ” saidVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityIntel ’ s update . The company recommends users update to v3.0.17 or later . Intel ’ s patch comesVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityduring a busy patch Tuesday week , which includes fixes from Adobe and Microsoft .
Developers are once again being blamedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityfor cloud back-end security vulnerabilities , this time in a new reportVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityfrom Appthority . The company published investigation results that found nearly 43 TB of enterprise data was exposedAttack.Databreachon cloud back-ends , including personally identifiable information ( PII ) . This comes just shortly after a similar report from a different security company . In the new `` 2017 Q2 Enterprise Mobile Threat Report '' report ( free upon providing registration info ) , Appthority found `` data leakageAttack.Databreach`` from mobile apps that send data to unsecured cloud back-ends . While security concerns typically focus on a triad of other factors -- apps , device threats and network threats -- this data leakageAttack.Databreachon the back-end was dubbed the `` HospitalGown '' threat because of that garment 's open back-end . `` In total , we foundVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityalmost 43 TB of data exposedAttack.Databreachand 1,000 apps affectedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityby the HospitalGown vulnerability , '' Appthority saidVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityin a blog post last week . `` Looking at a subset of 39 apps , we still found 280 million records exposedAttack.Databreach, a total of about 163 GB of data . This is a staggering amount of leaked information , and in some cases represents the entirety of customer or operational data for an enterprise . '' The reportVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityechoes the findings of an earlier reportVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityby RedLock Inc. , which revealedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitymany security issues primarily caused by user misconfigurations on public cloud platforms . RedLock claimed it found 82 percent of hosted databases remain unencrypted , among many other problems . As with the RedLock reportVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability, developers were blamedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityfor the HospitalGown vulnerabilities. `` HospitalGown is a vulnerability to data exposure caused , not by any code in the app , but by the app developers ' failure to properly secure the back-end ( hence its name ) servers with which the app communicates and where sensitive data is stored , '' Appthority said . Unsecured Elasticsearch servers and MongoDB databases were prime targets of a series of ransomware attacksAttack.Ransomearlier this year that generated widespread publicity in the security field . However , that publicity apparently was n't enough to significantly alleviate the issue . `` As our findings show , weakly secured back-ends in apps used by employees , partners and customers create a range of security risks including extensive data leaksAttack.Databreachof personally identifiable information ( PII ) and other sensitive data , '' the report states . `` They also significantly increase the risk of spear phishingAttack.Phishing, brute force login , social engineering , data ransomAttack.Ransom, and other attacks . And , HospitalGown makes data accessAttack.Databreachand exfiltrationAttack.Databreachfar easier than other types of attacks . '' Key findings of the report as listed by the company include : Affected apps are connecting to unsecured data stores on popular enterprise services , such as Elasticsearch and MySQL , which are leakingAttack.Databreachlarge amounts of sensitive data . Apps using just one of these services revealed almost 43TB of exposed data . Multiple affected apps leakedAttack.Databreachsome form of PII , including passwords , location , travel and payment details , corporate profile data ( including employees ' VPN PINs , emails , phone numbers ) , and retail customer data . Enterprise security teams do not have visibility into the risk due to the risk 's location in the mobile app vendor 's architecture stack . In multiple cases , data has already been accessedAttack.Databreachby unauthorized individuals and ransomedAttack.Ransom. Even apps that have been removed from devices and the app stores still pose an exposureAttack.Databreachrisk due to the sensitive data that remains stored on unsecured servers . The company saidVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityits Mobile Threat Team identifiedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythe HospitalGown vulnerabilities with a combination of its dynamic app analysis tool and a new back-end scanning method , looking at the network traffic on more than 1 million enterprise mobile apps , both iOS and Android . As with the misconfiguration problems identifiedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityin the RedLock reportVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability, Appthority emphasizedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythat all cases of HospitalGown vulnerabilities were caused by human errors , not malicious intent or inherent infrastructure problems . That human error was especially prevalent in two app implementations investigated by Appthority : Pulse Workspace ( for accessing enterprise network and Web applications ) and Jacto apps ( from an agricultural machinery company ) .
Developers are once again being blamedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityfor cloud back-end security vulnerabilities , this time in a new reportVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityfrom Appthority . The company published investigation results that found nearly 43 TB of enterprise data was exposedAttack.Databreachon cloud back-ends , including personally identifiable information ( PII ) . This comes just shortly after a similar report from a different security company . In the new `` 2017 Q2 Enterprise Mobile Threat Report '' report ( free upon providing registration info ) , Appthority found `` data leakageAttack.Databreach`` from mobile apps that send data to unsecured cloud back-ends . While security concerns typically focus on a triad of other factors -- apps , device threats and network threats -- this data leakageAttack.Databreachon the back-end was dubbed the `` HospitalGown '' threat because of that garment 's open back-end . `` In total , we foundVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityalmost 43 TB of data exposedAttack.Databreachand 1,000 apps affectedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityby the HospitalGown vulnerability , '' Appthority saidVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityin a blog post last week . `` Looking at a subset of 39 apps , we still found 280 million records exposedAttack.Databreach, a total of about 163 GB of data . This is a staggering amount of leaked information , and in some cases represents the entirety of customer or operational data for an enterprise . '' The reportVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityechoes the findings of an earlier reportVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityby RedLock Inc. , which revealedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitymany security issues primarily caused by user misconfigurations on public cloud platforms . RedLock claimed it found 82 percent of hosted databases remain unencrypted , among many other problems . As with the RedLock reportVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability, developers were blamedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityfor the HospitalGown vulnerabilities. `` HospitalGown is a vulnerability to data exposure caused , not by any code in the app , but by the app developers ' failure to properly secure the back-end ( hence its name ) servers with which the app communicates and where sensitive data is stored , '' Appthority said . Unsecured Elasticsearch servers and MongoDB databases were prime targets of a series of ransomware attacksAttack.Ransomearlier this year that generated widespread publicity in the security field . However , that publicity apparently was n't enough to significantly alleviate the issue . `` As our findings show , weakly secured back-ends in apps used by employees , partners and customers create a range of security risks including extensive data leaksAttack.Databreachof personally identifiable information ( PII ) and other sensitive data , '' the report states . `` They also significantly increase the risk of spear phishingAttack.Phishing, brute force login , social engineering , data ransomAttack.Ransom, and other attacks . And , HospitalGown makes data accessAttack.Databreachand exfiltrationAttack.Databreachfar easier than other types of attacks . '' Key findings of the report as listed by the company include : Affected apps are connecting to unsecured data stores on popular enterprise services , such as Elasticsearch and MySQL , which are leakingAttack.Databreachlarge amounts of sensitive data . Apps using just one of these services revealed almost 43TB of exposed data . Multiple affected apps leakedAttack.Databreachsome form of PII , including passwords , location , travel and payment details , corporate profile data ( including employees ' VPN PINs , emails , phone numbers ) , and retail customer data . Enterprise security teams do not have visibility into the risk due to the risk 's location in the mobile app vendor 's architecture stack . In multiple cases , data has already been accessedAttack.Databreachby unauthorized individuals and ransomedAttack.Ransom. Even apps that have been removed from devices and the app stores still pose an exposureAttack.Databreachrisk due to the sensitive data that remains stored on unsecured servers . The company saidVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityits Mobile Threat Team identifiedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythe HospitalGown vulnerabilities with a combination of its dynamic app analysis tool and a new back-end scanning method , looking at the network traffic on more than 1 million enterprise mobile apps , both iOS and Android . As with the misconfiguration problems identifiedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityin the RedLock reportVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability, Appthority emphasizedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythat all cases of HospitalGown vulnerabilities were caused by human errors , not malicious intent or inherent infrastructure problems . That human error was especially prevalent in two app implementations investigated by Appthority : Pulse Workspace ( for accessing enterprise network and Web applications ) and Jacto apps ( from an agricultural machinery company ) .